Holding out for More Fails


English: United States Federal Courthouse in D...
Image via Wikipedia

A plaintiff claiming entitlement to underinsured motorist benefits denied because he did not settle with the responsible party before attempting to make a claim for underinsured benefits on his own policy. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decided that a plaintiff has to settle his/her claim with the liability carrier before underinsured motorist benefits are payable in Zbenger v. Allied Insurance Company. The lack of ripeness prevails and shows that it is not always beneficial to hold out for more. (http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/10-1421/10-1421-2011-12-06.html).

About strategicdefenselaw

Christina L. Dixon is managing member at The Dixon Law Firm in Denver, Colorado. Ms. Dixon's primary focus is on representing insurance companies and their insured in first and third-party bad faith and coverage litigation and employer liability defense litigation.
This entry was posted in Insurance Litigation and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s